Bouquet
1920's --Writing Center
- Encourage dialogue/ dialectic--just like we do today (North 1 similarity)
- Stanley: a first director in writing lab in Iowa---encouraged students to be better [independent] writers/ thinkers (North 1 supports)--we try to follow this model here
- Problem: writing labs --tied with remedial students--(North 1 and 2 both touch upon this theory)
- UNC model: grammar fix it shop--problem we have today in W/C's where North 1 mentions this point quite extensively, "For whatever reasons writing centers have gotten mostly this kind of press, have been represented--or misrepresented more often as fix-it shop than any other way, and in some fairly influential places." (North 1, p.6)
- Disciplinary measure--was talked about in the Bouquet piece where a Professor would put CC so that the student would go down to the lab/writing center to have errors corrected. (North 1 called such philosophy abhorrent and North 2 was totally disgusted with 64 errors a University professor pointed out to a student or a "see me" written in bold letters at the top of a student's paper.
- psycho therapeutic approach to writing lab work -Rogeria directive- ask series of Questions to draw out knowledge that already had--we do that today in the Writing Center, they wanted students to feel safe & secure like therapy where close doors would provide that confidential "home" environment. (North 1 talks about a marriage between writing as a process and student centered writing curricula.) (North 1, p.69)
- In Bouquet, she wants to change views of writing centers from remedial view to secure, therapeutic session where average students can go. (This philosophy is also found on North 2 where the author explains the ultimate writing center in his mind is where everyone can meet and talk about writing--not only for 250 undergrads or 10 faculty who have a clue as to what the writing center should be really about--where writers are talking about writing with their coaches/other students vice versa, writers feel motivated, and there is a relationship exchange between students and the writing center and instructors.) (North 2, p.88-89)
- Structured linguistics--to observe repeatable patterns (As in North 2, this is what every student would hope the writing centers did, but I don't think that's part of the agenda or will be anytime soon.)
- Language writing--teach as content--One on One conferencing (I think this is the point that North 1 is trying to get across that through more coaching, we will have more grasp on the whole process whether if its on the writing process or the beginning process.) "I think the best way to describe a writing center tutor's relationship to composing is to say that a tutor is a holist devoted to a participant-observer methodology." (North 1, p.70)
- Philosophies are not neutral just like the North 1 piece where it has one main philosophy on writing centers yet it shifts on what they aren't, finds it abominable what they are saying, and figures out how to make it better--yet then in North 2 re-discovers that he was wrong in North 1 about his theories, and tries to restate the reasons for writing North 1, the notions of writing centers even after the first piece, and what we can do to change it or his wish list of what writing centers still need, still need to work on, and where they are going.
- To sum up the idea of writing center vs. institution--Bouquet states that we know that the writing center needs more, she responds to North 1 and 2 with this: "that agenda, though, is couched in a decidedly Woolfian interpretation of the value of the writing center, one emphasizing the necessity of room and time and teachable moments."(Bouquet, p.55) In other words, Bouquet's philosophy says I understand what's needed but get over it and work with what you have--pretty much a passive, laid-back approach to working through the issues in a writing center.